<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persuasion vs Participation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordymouth.com/2008/01/25/persuasion-vs-participation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/persuasion-vs-participation/</link>
	<description>A bloviation on the practice of public relations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Old Media Evolution (and Other PR Blog Jots) &#171; Media Bullseye &#8211; A New Media and Communications Magazine</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/persuasion-vs-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-19431</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Media Evolution (and Other PR Blog Jots) &#171; Media Bullseye &#8211; A New Media and Communications Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2008/01/25/persuasion-vs-participation/#comment-19431</guid>
		<description>[...] back. &#8220;I think that the PR industry had been in the doledrums for many years, but that the rise of Social Media has energized the field.  While the advertising agencies will always find a way to make things sexier, Social Media is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back. &#8220;I think that the PR industry had been in the doledrums for many years, but that the rise of Social Media has energized the field.  While the advertising agencies will always find a way to make things sexier, Social Media is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tools of the Trade &#171; Public Relations.</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/persuasion-vs-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-16259</link>
		<dc:creator>Tools of the Trade &#171; Public Relations.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2008/01/25/persuasion-vs-participation/#comment-16259</guid>
		<description>[...] and to get an audience to act in a certain way;  PR and persuasion go hand in hand.  On Wordymouth.com,  Michael Sommermeyer explains how persuasion can be used to sell an idea to someone as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and to get an audience to act in a certain way;  PR and persuasion go hand in hand.  On Wordymouth.com,  Michael Sommermeyer explains how persuasion can be used to sell an idea to someone as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasel</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/persuasion-vs-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-6496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2008/01/25/persuasion-vs-participation/#comment-6496</guid>
		<description>Wow!! What a post! I got good knowledge from your site. You gave a clear note and difference between persuasion and participation. It is very useful and helpful.I am really thankful to you for that. People expect the laws of persuasion to be difficult. I came across one site which consists of good information about &lt;a href=&quot;http://persuasioninsider.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;persuasion&lt;/a&gt;. You can get some other information from that site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! What a post! I got good knowledge from your site. You gave a clear note and difference between persuasion and participation. It is very useful and helpful.I am really thankful to you for that. People expect the laws of persuasion to be difficult. I came across one site which consists of good information about persuasion. You can get some other information from that site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

