<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One, Two, Three, Who&#8217;s Got PR 3.0? Three, Four, Five, It&#8217;s Just PR Jive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/</link>
	<description>A bloviation on the practice of public relations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRWeek Responds to 3.0 Fallout &#124; PR2.0</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/comment-page-1/#comment-9983</link>
		<dc:creator>PRWeek Responds to 3.0 Fallout &#124; PR2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/#comment-9983</guid>
		<description>[...] reactions:WordymouthEngageinPRMurphy&#8217;s LawPRWeek&#8217;s The CycleGeoff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reactions:WordymouthEngageinPRMurphy&#8217;s LawPRWeek&#8217;s The CycleGeoff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zurga</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/comment-page-1/#comment-6319</link>
		<dc:creator>zurga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/#comment-6319</guid>
		<description>I sure hope this doesn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t imitate the New Coke v. Old Coke debate.
funny funny
 - But, and I?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢m trying not to be a pessimist, not too many PR folks are using these social tools - Russian pr makers thinking like
www.blogpr.ru/addcomment/721/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope this doesn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t imitate the New Coke v. Old Coke debate.<br />
funny funny<br />
 &#8211; But, and I?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢m trying not to be a pessimist, not too many PR folks are using these social tools &#8211; Russian pr makers thinking like<br />
<a href="http://www.blogpr.ru/addcomment/721/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogpr.ru/addcomment/721/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas04: close to attraction</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/comment-page-1/#comment-6227</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas04: close to attraction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/#comment-6227</guid>
		<description>[...] re: 3.0 can be found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] re: 3.0 can be found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Solis</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/comment-page-1/#comment-6156</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Solis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/#comment-6156</guid>
		<description>AMEN. It&#039;s why I spend most of my time helping the rest of the industry catch up with &quot;2.0&quot; so that we can fold it all back into plain ol PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN. It&#8217;s why I spend most of my time helping the rest of the industry catch up with &#8220;2.0&#8243; so that we can fold it all back into plain ol PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cycle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Public relations 3.0? What the&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/comment-page-1/#comment-6155</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cycle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Public relations 3.0? What the&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/#comment-6155</guid>
		<description>[...] re: 3.0 can be found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] re: 3.0 can be found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://wordymouth.com/pr/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/comment-page-1/#comment-6154</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordymouth.com/2007/04/25/one-two-three-whos-got-pr-30-three-four-five-its-just-pr-jive/#comment-6154</guid>
		<description>Agree, agree, agree!  My comment yesterday was that PR Week is behind the times and needs to commit themselves more to detailing the methodologies behind new PR practices rather than coming up with monikers.

/kff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, agree, agree!  My comment yesterday was that PR Week is behind the times and needs to commit themselves more to detailing the methodologies behind new PR practices rather than coming up with monikers.</p>
<p>/kff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

